Outside Latin America, I found to my dismay very few people knew her, and I long wondered why. Was it because she wrote in Portuguese, a language whose literary productions were so invisible outside its own territory that it was once nicknamed “the tomb of thought”? Was it because nobody expects the greatest Jewish writer since Kafka to be a part-time beauty columnist whose Chanel suits and wraparound sunglasses made her look more like a Rio socialite than a mystic genius?—Robert Birnbaum
…Guillermo Arriaga, a famous Mexican novelist and screenwriter, said that you can’t read Clarice Lispector without falling in love with her.
And that is exactly what I hoped I could make happen by writing “Why This World”: to get more people, not just the literati, but everyone who cares about art and literature, to fall in love with her.
Having recently noted Rebecca Solnit’s encouraging study of community responses to disasters (like Hurricane Katrina), I also availed myself of an opportunity to chat with Tracy Kidder (Mountains Beyond Mountains), whose new book, Strength in What Remains (Random House), vividly and honestly chronicles the truly extraordinary ordeal of Deogratias, a medical student who escapes the horrors of his homeland of Burundi and lands in New York City with $200, knowing no English and knowing no one.
In On Kindness (FSG), psychiatrist Adam Phillips (Side Effects) and historian Barbara Taylor (Eve and the New Jerusalem) argue that kindness has become imperiled: “This is a historical story—about how and why people have been talked out of their kindness—but also a psychological one, a story about how vulnerability becomes traumatic to people.”
If there is a blacker mark of shame on the history of American governance (the genocide of Native Americans and the enslavement of Africans notwithstanding), I am open to considering it. (Local so-called riots—Tulsa, Rosewood—don’t qualify as they did not have federal government complicity.) The fact that all of America witnessed the disaster of Hurricane Katrina and the debacle of the aftermath seems not to have registered in the public consciousness. The recent anniversary reminds me that there are some useful, impressive books on the tragedy of New Orleans. In addition to Tom Piazza’s excellent novel City of Refuge (which we regularly tout here at TMN), Piazza in a matter of a few months published Why New Orleans Matters (Harper), a compelling broadside arguing for the irreplaceable import of New Orleans and worrying about emotional climate in the Crescent City: “That spirit is in terrible jeopardy right now. If it dies, something precious and profound will go out of the world forever.”The stories of the seven people in A.D. are quite particular and highly personal, but my hope is that they provide a window for readers who aren’t Katrina survivors into a world that few of us understand, but that we’ll be trying to make sense of for a long time to come. I also hope that readers will understand what it means that Denise, Leo, Michelle, Abbas, Darnell, Kwame, and Brobson are still rebuilding their lives and that the city they love has a long way to go, too.Founder of QbaDisc records, music historian, and musician Ned Sublette—whose “Cowboy Rumba” is one of my favorite records (imagine a meringue version of “Ghost Riders in the Sky”)—was in New Orleans for Tulane University in 2004 and 2005, and as he writes, “We couldn’t know we were scrutinizing, day by day, the last year the city would be whole.” With The Year Before the Flood: A Story of New Orleans (Lawrence Hill), Sublette has created an aromatic bouillabaisse of history, personal testimony, memoir, analysis, and anecdote about what must be the most interesting city in the continental United States.
Boyden has a chameleon-like ability to inhabit any persona, of any race or age, so fully and seamlessly it’s hard to remember that these people are invented rather than real. Pre-Katrina New Orleans leaps to life on every page, a beautiful, seamy, fragile city on the brink of chaos and ruin.For his album The City That Care Forgot (429 Records), Mac Rebenak, aka Dr. John, adopts the name first coined in New Orleans city guide from the Federal Writers’ Project—though no explanation for that title exists—for his homage to his native city and the destruction and tragedy wrought by Katrina and parties known and unknown. Eric Clapton sits in. Audio here and here. The good doctor is angry and he is sad. Which is the way it is.
A documentary is only as good as its subjects For Levees we had an abundance of heroic and eloquent individuals—black, white Hispanic, male, female, young, old—who shared themselves with the world. As we made more trips down to New Orleans it became apparent to me that Phyllis had emerged as the dominant voice in the piece.By the way, as Michael Grunwald wrote in the August 13, 2007, issue of Time, “The most important thing to remember about the drowning of New Orleans is that it wasn’t a natural disaster.” —Robert Birnbaum
On our final trip we filmed Phyllis in her F.E.M.A. trailer where she gave me a big surprise. She asked if you could read on camera a poem she had written the night before. To be honest I have never been a fan of poetry and was not expecting much. But being cordial I said go ahead and read it. We rolled the camera and in painful and truthful words she summed up the entire four-hour documentary. Silently I thought, “Thank God. Now we have an ending.”
By now if you have any interest in American history or Abraham Lincoln, you are aware that 2009 marks the 200th anniversary of his birth, and naturally there is a gush of books adding to the already voluminous Lincoln bibliography. I have already dealt with a few of these tomes earlier, knowing an update would be useful as the year wore on. Rather than wading through more Lincoln titles, I am inclined to focus on the long and the short of recent Lincoln scholarship.“But one way of paying tribute to it is to say that it introduces the elusive idea of destiny from the very start, and one means of illustrating this is to show how the earlier chapters continually prefigure, or body forth, the more momentous events that are to be dealt with in the later ones.”—Robert Birnbaum
The mantle of unacknowledgement falls on many shoulders beyond the poetic brotherhood (and sisterhood): librarians, primary school teachers, booksellers, and so forth. The many small (this description apparently refers to circulation size) magazines and their preternaturally dedicated staffs existing across the U.S. and the known world are overqualified for this honorable designation.What connects these narratives is that they are true, and represent a struggle, a particular struggle whose value I can’t overstate. The author of each labored to put words to his or her experience. To articulate it, to speak it, to write it honestly, which requires something more than effort. Each made a commitment essential to writing about one’s own life, a promise that goes far beyond the act of writing.Open City continues to offer offbeat gems and a variety of unorthodoxies. The Summer 2009 issue by editors Thomas Beller and Johanna Yas contains fiction by Vestal McIntyre, Eva Marer, Zachary Lazar, and A.M. Homes, with nonfiction from Bryan Charles, Patricia Bosworth (on Lois Gould), and Edmund White (on Harold Brodkey), plus poetry by Billy Collins.
Is the personal essay a narcissistic form? Not when it succeeds as art. Narcissus perished because he fell in love with his reflection. The twenty writers whose work is collected in this volume pushed past the masks all of us present to the mirror, the neighbor, the spouse. The commitment they’ve made is to report what they find under the surface of their lives no matter how disappointing, threatening, or admirable. Because our virtues are difficult to own, perhaps even more than our faults.
It was not too long ago (that’s in historical time, not 24/7 time) that comics, along with blue jeans and rock and roll, were somehow considered—by anxious parents and the usual whack jobs—to be contributors to juvenile delinquency. It was just one of the great panics of the allegedly idyllic Eisenhower years (others included nuclear devastation, miscegenation, and communist conspiracies—to which we owe the slogan, “Better Dead than Red”—and so forth). By the ’60s, parents and other authorities had other worries and so-called comics, in the nimble hands of Jules Feiffer, Robert Crumb, Edward Gorey, Gahan Wilson, and a host of others, took on a more socially relevant turn. With Art Speigelman’s Pulitzer Prize-winning Maus, illustrated narratives were finally legitimized—leading to the designation “graphic novel.”“An unflinching and gripping photographic memoir, The Photographer takes you on a breathtaking journey through the best and worst humanity has to offer in times of war. Turning its pages, the reader begins to understand what it means to lose everything as a refugee of war, to cross mountains to help someone you never met, to feel the intense responsibility of being the only one able to capture the last moments of a child’s stolen life. Suddenly Afghanistan, a distant land, a foreign culture, a courageous and resilient people seem closer, more familiar—more human. I love this book.”—Robert Birnbaum
MacMillan’s (Paris 1919 and Nixon and Mao) short text (under 200 pages) investigates how history affects us all:
History is something we all do, even if, like the man who discovered he was writing prose, we do not always realize it. We want to make sense of our own lives and often we wonder about our place in our own societies and how we got to be here. So we tell each other stories, not always true ones, and we ask questions about ourselves. Such stories and questions inevitably lead us to the past…Peppering her discourse with examples (Robespierre, Leon Trotsky, Adolf Hitler, Winston Churchill, Golda Meir, Mao Zedong, Karl Marx, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, George W. Bush, the Dalai Lama, and Henry “History Is Bunk” Ford) vividly and lucidly makes her uncomplicated point.
We use history to understand ourselves and we ought to use history to understand others…History can be helpful; it can also be very dangerous. It is wiser to think of history not as a pile of dead leaves…but as a pool, sometimes benign, often sulfurous that lies under the present silently shaping our institutions our ways of thought, our likes and dislikes.
In his slender tome (132 pages), Hogeland (The Whiskey Rebellion: George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and the Frontier Rebels Who Challenged America’s Newfound Sovereignty) argues that American public history—the stuff of Ken Burns and other documentaries and museum exhibitions—is inclined to celebration (without the kind of scrutiny and careful analysis that inevitably leads to compromised conclusions). To make his point, Hogeland discusses three examples of distorted history—the rehabilitation and revival of Alexander Hamilton; recent tributes to gadfly, activist, and folksinger Pete Seeger and conservative standard-bearer William Buckley; and Philadelphia’s Constitution Center—and argues that there are negative consequences in politicizing historiography.
Even a brief glance at any bibliography on World War I will show you that there have been countless doorstop-sized tomes written solely on the causes of the war, particular battles, leaders, peace treaties, and on and on. That former Oxford University mentor and historian Stone (Eastern Front 1914-1917) has fashioned a concise 200-page survey is a commendable feat of clarity, bringing readers to the (inevitable) conclusion that the great disaster of the Great War’s end was that the Germans did not think they had been defeated. They had been, as General Ludendorff parroted, “stabbed in the back” by you-know-who. So the conflict that lead to 14 million deaths and 20 million wounded became a temporary cessation of hostilities.
I actually lived through and participated in the era unimaginatively referred to as the Sixties—there was war and drugs and madness and dancing in the streets, assassinations and a presidential resignation and Woodstock and Watts, the Black Panthers, the White Panthers, the Grey Panthers, and, well, you know, a lot of action. And there were some heroes and villains. Recently, a few books have been published that add some small pieces to the incomplete historical jigsaw puzzle. In 1968, Mark Rudd, author of Underground: My Life With S.D.S. and the Weathermen (William Morrow, excerpt) was a Columbia undergraduate and a member of the radical Students for a Democratic Society. Rudd soon transmogrified into a more militant radical—one who founded the S.D.S. splinter group Weather Underground, which was responsible for the post-1968 “Days of Rage” and a string of bombings.
And then there is subversive satirist and gadfly (or as he describes himself, investigative satirist) Paul Krassner, author of Who’s to Say What’s Obscene: Politics, Culture, and Comedy in America Today (City Lights, excerpt). Friend of martyred comic Lenny Bruce and the editor of Bruce’s autobiography, How to Talk Dirty and Influence People, Krassner was also publisher of The Realist magazine from 1958 to 1974, and co-founder of the Youth International Party (the Yippies) with Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin. He has now been inducted into the Counterculture Hall of Fame (created in 1997). Here’s Kurt Vonnegut on Krassner:
…in 1963 created a miracle of compressed intelligence nearly as admirable for potent simplicity, in my opinion, as Einstein’s e=mc2. With the Vietnam War going on, and with its critics discounted and scorned by the government and the mass media, Krassner put on sale a red, white and blue poster that said FUCK COMMUNISM.—Robert Birnbaum
At the beginning of the 1960s, FUCK was believed to be so full of bad magic as to be unprintable. In the most humanely influential American novel of this half century, The Catcher in the Rye, Holden Caulfield, it will be remembered, was shocked to see that word on a subway station wall. He wondered what seeing it might do to the mind of a little kid. COMMUNISM was to millions the name of the most loathsome evil imaginable. To call an American a communist was like calling somebody a Jew in Nazi Germany. By having FUCK and COMMUNISM fight it out in a single sentence, Krassner wasn’t merely being funny as heck. He was demonstrating how preposterous it was for so many people to be responding to both words with such cockamamie Pavlovian fear and alarm.
Feiffer’s great work at the Village Voice has also been compiled (and also by Fantagraphics). Now come three recent works by the three amigos that warrant notice. Sorel, whose illustrations and caricatures have adorned more than a fair share of New Yorker and other smart magazine covers, normally collaborates with wife Nancy on his forays into literature and history. In the case of Certitude: A Profusely Illustrated Guide to Blockheads and Bullheads, Past and Present (Harmony), book critic Adam Begley and Sorel lampoon (and harpoon) nearly 50 world historical figures (Tom Cruise? Madonna?) who were convinced of some notion or belief—only to be clearly and definitively wrong. As the authors cheerfully exhibit with this well-chosen epigram from Ambrose Bierce, “To be positive: to be mistaken at the top of one’s voice.” In Christopher Hitchens’s introduction (an essayistic gem that redoubles the value of this small but mighty tome), he observes, “from George Armstrong Custer to the teak headed British generals on the Western Front, we have shining examples of those who kept doing the same old thing, each time hoping for a different result. This conforms to George Santayana’s definition of fanaticism, which is redoubling your efforts when you have forgotten your aims.” This collection of sketches of the likes of Girolamo Savonarola, Carry A. Nation, Arthur Conan Doyle, Herbert Hoover, Sam Goldwyn, Joseph Stalin, and Bush & Co excellently illustrates that point exponentially.
David Levine also has a long career illustrating: The New York Review of Books (in which he has appeared in every issue for 45 years), Time, Newsweek, Esquire, Playboy, The New Yorker, New York Magazine, and The Nation, among others. His drawing of Lyndon Johnson revealing a scar in the shape of Vietnam is considered one of the most recognized (and most copied) of the Vietnam era—just one vivid example of Levine’s extraordinarily acute vision and biting humor. Bill Moyers comments, “of another contemporary American political cartoonist it has been said that had he not become an artist he would have found his calling as a professional assassin…not so with Levine… He has far too much class… But remember this too about a man who could be so merciless and devastating in his portrayal of our poo-bahs. A great intelligence guided his hand and also a great heart. Even as he held their flaws and foibles high on the skewer he never seems driven by malevolence. ‘I love my species,’ he one said. And why not? He could not have had better material.” American Presidents (Fantagraphics) is a 128-page compilation that assembles Levine’s survey of American leaders and their coteries and skewers them with delightful results. It should be a required text in American history courses—Levine’s images powerfully expose the venality, duplicity, and hypocrisy of the upper reaches of our government.
Seymour Chwast, co-founder of Push Pin Studios (with Milton Glazer, Reynold Ruffins, and Sorel) has been a design trailblazer and seminally influential illustrator for nearly 60 years, and has designed and illustrated more than 30 books. While more commercially involved than other artists mentioned, as shown in Seymour: The Obsessive Images of Seymour Chwast (Chronicle Books), a splendidly edited and reproduced 270 page monograph, Chwast does indulge his sense of engagement with The Nose, a regularly published, 24-page newsletter that he designs and illustrates in order to “draw attention to relevant social issues as well as trivial ones.” Design historian Steven Heller and designer Paul Scher (also Chwast’s spouse) both provide illuminating commentary—if you want to go deeper than the compelling illustrations. —Robert Birnbaum
University of North Carolina mentor and scholar Louis A. Pérez, Jr. has created a singular oeuvre (On Becoming Cuban: Identity, Nationality, and Culture; The War of 1898: The United States and Cuba in History and Historiography; Winds of Change: Hurricanes and the Transformation of Nineteenth-Century Cuba; To Die in Cuba: Suicide and Society) and his recent Cuba in the American Imagination: Metaphor and the Imperial Ethos (The University of North Carolina Press) is in one sense a summation of his distinguished work over the past several decades, as distinguished historian Walter LaFeber points out. He goes on to sagely assert:
It is particularly significant because the U.S.-Cuban relationship is going to have to be fundamentally rethought and reshaped in the near future, and this work not only provides critical information, but also acts as a loud warning about how that debate must not be conducted.This is exactly the kind of book policymakers and the chattering classes ought to be readingsomething beyond the ignorant regurgitations of past thinking.
Boston writer Roland Merullo, in Fidel’s Last Days (Shaye Areheart Books) takes on the amorphous period that marks the decline of Fidel and his cadre. There is a lot of spycraft and bureaucratic chicanery being employed by various government and non-government operatives, whose real allegiances (as the reader is no doubt supposed to question) may or may not provide dramatic tension. Former C.I.A. agent Carolina Perez is an interesting characterhaving given up a promising career to join the super-secret (and wealthy exile-sponsored) White Orchid in its mission to rid Cuba of Fidel. Across the straits, Carlos Gutierrez, minister of health and a member of Castro’s inner circle, is recruited to aid in Castro’s curtain call.
The Bacardi name, instantly recognizable as a brand, is also attached to a family with a rich Caribbean historya century and a half of which is intimately entwined with the growth of a Cuban national identity. Professor Pérez, cited above, comments about Bacardi and the Long Fight for Cuba: The Biography of a Cause (Viking) by Tom Gjelten:
Contained within family genealogy are often found profound insights into the history of an entire people. The Bacardis represent one such family. Gjelten has fashioned a splendid prism through which to cast new light on the human dimensions of the Cuban past. The epochal transitions of Cuban national formation are experienced through successive generations of Bacardis, revealing the complex ways that a people are overtaken by the forces of their own creation. Anyone with an interest in Cuban history – and a fondness for Cuban rum – will find the Bacardi family history irresistible.You can read an excerpt of the book here.
Awareness of the mafia in Cuba (or at least in Havana) began with Coppola’s The Godfather, Sydney Pollack’s Havana, and the startling (well, to some people) revelations regarding the spy agency/mob attempts to assassinate Fidel Castro. T.J. English’s Havana Nocturne: How the Mob Owned Cuba
and Then Lost It to the Revolution (William Morrow) is a sobering and compelling (considering the American love affair with its gangsters) account of the way American organized crime attached itself to Cuban societydocumenting the machinations of Meyer Lansky and his cronies to gain control of Cuba’s sin industries.
Chicagoan and DePaul University mentor Achy Obejas (Days of Awe), whom Junot Díaz, with a small slight of hand, calls one of the Cuba’s most important writers, has a new novel, Ruins (Akashic Books), which deals with a concern that no doubt has confronted and continues to confront many Cubansloyalty to the Revolution, its ideology and precepts, and the ongoing Cuban reality. The book’s main character, Usnavy, remains a good 26th July adherent from 1959 even beyond his best friend’s departure during the 1994 Mareil Boatlift. The discovery of the potential value of an oversized stained-glass lamp he inherited from his mother puts his dismal but well-ordered life into disarray.
By now, the presence of pre-’60s American cars is very much a part of the picture of present-day Cuba. Not quite preserved in amber (no American auto parts have made it to the island for half a century), about 60,000 cars are kept rolling with bailing wire, chewing gum, ingenuity, and the waving of chicken claws. Barcelona based journalist Richard Schweid traveled the island creating an auto-centric account of Cuban life in Che’s Chevrolet, Fidel’s Oldsmobile: On the Road in Cuba (The University of North Carolina Press). Not quite as interesting as Carlo Gebler’s Driving Through Cuba: Rare Encounters in the Land of Sugar Cane and Revolution (the Irish writer’s hunt for a 1959 Coup deVille Brougham), but packed with anecdotes and everyday life moments. By the way, the title refers to the claim that Fidel rode to the embattled Bay of Pigs in an Oldsmobile.
Cuban (and Cuban-born) literary scholar Eduardo R. del Rio interviewed a dozen Cuban-American writers (all born in Cuba) to investigate their commonality in One Island, Many Voices: Conversations With Cuban-American Writers (University of Arizona Press). He spoke with Nilo Cruz, Roberto Fernández, Cristina García, Carolina Hospital, Eduardo Machado, Dionisio Martínez, Pablo Medina, Achy Obejas, Ricardo Pau-Llosa, Gustavo Pérez Firmat, Dolores Prida, and Virgil Suarezbut as the title of this anthology indicates, commonality was not the case. He concludes:
What strikes me most is how unique each of them is. At first this seems like a trivial, inconsequential observation. However, when I consider my mission was to collect a group of ‘similar’ writers, all of whom left Cuba as children or young adults, their divergence forces me to examine the issue more closely.Happily, del Rio’s mission is ambient to the good stories and vivid voices encapsulated in this collection.